MERRITT v. USA
| LOGAN WAYNE MERRITT |
| USA |
| 1:2023cv01018 |
| June 30, 2023 |
| United States Federal Claims Court |
| David A Tapp |
| Unjust conviction and Imprisonment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 Tucker Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
Mail Returned re: #3 Notice of Non-ECF Case, #4 Notice of Random Assignment, #5 General Order; Pro Se. Document returned because: Unclaimed, unable to forward. Mail sent to LOGAN WAYNE MERRITT. (ypb)
|
|
Filing 10
Mail Returned re: #6 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, Unreported Opinion. Document returned because: No longer in custody. Unclaimed, return to sender. Mail sent to LOGAN WAYNE MERRITT. (ypb)
|
|
Filing 9
Mail Returned re: #8 Judgment. Document returned because: No longer in custody. Returned to sender - unable to forward. Mail sent to Logan Wayne Merritt. (ypb)
|
|
Filing 8
JUDGMENT entered, pursuant to Rule 58, dismissing plaintiff's complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. (Service on parties made; plaintiff served via first class mail. ) (dls)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew Paul Roche for USA . (Roche, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 6
OPINION AND ORDER: The Clerk is directed to ENTER judgment DISMISSING plaintiff's complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, pursuant to RCFC 12(h)(3). Signed by Judge David A. Tapp. (krm) Service on parties made. Plaintiff served via Certified mail 7018 2290 0000 5183 7467 on 07.13.2023 (cam). Modified on 7/13/2023 (cam).
|
|
Filing 5
GENERAL ORDER No. 2022-01 dated 9/12/2022 continuing the suspension of paper filing requirements in pro se cases: Consistent with this court's General Orders issued on 3/18/2020, 11/13/2020, 12/23/2020, and 3/3/2021, it is ordered that judges, special masters, the Clerk of Court, and counsel of record for the United States may file electronically in pro se cases using the court's Case Management/Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system. Pro se litigants shall, absent extraordinary circumstances, submit all case filings via e-mail to ProSe_case_filings@cfc.uscourts.gov. Pro se litigants may, if feasible, receive notification by e-mail of all electronic filings by filing an E-Notification Consent Form, attached to the General Order. Signed by Chief Judge Elaine D. Kaplan. (ypb) Service on parties made. Plaintiff served via mail on 7/3/23 (ypb).
|
|
Filing 4
Notice of Random Assignment Pursuant to Rule 40.1(a) to Judge David A. Tapp. (ypb) Plaintiff served via mail on 7/3/23 (ypb).
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Non-ECF Case. (ypb) Plaintiff served via mail on 7/3/23 (ypb).
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by LOGAN WAYNE MERRITT. Service: 7/3/2023. Response due by 7/14/2023. (Attachments: #1 Prisoner Authorization Form)(ypb)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against USA (O) (Copy Served Electronically on Department of Justice), filed by LOGAN WAYNE MERRITT.Answer due by 9/1/2023. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Envelope)(ypb)
|
| Search for this case: MERRITT v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: LOGAN WAYNE MERRITT | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: USA | |
| Represented By: | Matthew Paul Roche |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
