D'AGOSTINO v. USA
| STEVEN D'AGOSTINO |
| USA |
| 1:2023cv01042 |
| July 3, 2023 |
| United States Federal Claims Court |
| COFC Office |
| Richard A Hertling |
| Miscellaneous - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 Tucker Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER In accordance with RCFC 7.2(b)(1), theplaintiff shall file his response to the defendant's motion #8 by 9/28/2023. A failure bythe plaintiff to file a response by that date will result in the dismissal of his complaint withoutprejudice pursuant to RCFC 41(b). If the plaintiff requires more time to respond, he must file amotion seeking additional time before that date. No reply brief by the defendant shall be filedunless ordered by the Court. Signed by Judge Richard A. Hertling. (agg) Service on parties made.
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION to Dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) , filed by USA.Response due by 9/28/2023.(Hicks, Rachel)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Appearance by Rachel Hicks for USA . (Hicks, Rachel)
|
|
Filing 6
UNREPORTED OPINION and ORDER that the #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. Accordingly, the claims against Discover Bank and the New Jersey Motor Vehicle Commission and its director, Latricia Littles-Floyd, are outside the jurisdiction of the Court of Federal Claims. The complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to RCFC 12(b)(1) and 12(h)(3) against those defendants. The claims against the defendant United States remain pending. The defendant shall file an answer or appropriate motion by 9/5/2023. Signed by Judge Richard A. Hertling. (agg) Service on parties made; plaintiff served via first class mail on 8/25/23. (dls)
|
|
Filing 5
GENERAL ORDER No. 2022-01 dated 9/12/2022 continuing the suspension of paper filing requirements in pro se cases: Consistent with this court's General Orders issued on 3/18/2020, 11/13/2020, 12/23/2020, and 3/3/2021, it is ordered that judges, special masters, the Clerk of Court, and counsel of record for the United States may file electronically in pro se cases using the court's Case Management/Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system. Pro se litigants shall, absent extraordinary circumstances, submit all case filings via e-mail to ProSe_case_filings@cfc.uscourts.gov. Pro se litigants may, if feasible, receive notification by e-mail of all electronic filings by filing an E-Notification Consent Form, attached to the General Order. (ew) Service on parties made. Modified on 7/7/2023 (ew). Docket entries 3-5 served via first class mail to plaintiff.
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Non-ECF Case. (ew)
|
|
Filing 3
Notice of Random Assignment Pursuant to Rule 40.1(a) to Judge Richard A. Hertling. (ew)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by STEVEN D'AGOSTINO. Service: 7/3/2023. Response due by 7/17/2023.(ew)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against USA (O) (Copy Served Electronically on Department of Justice), filed by STEVEN D'AGOSTINO.Answer due by 9/5/2023.(ew)
|
| Search for this case: D'AGOSTINO v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: STEVEN D'AGOSTINO | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: USA | |
| Represented By: | Rachel Hicks |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
