BROWN v. US
| DAVID EDWARD BROWN |
| USA |
| 1:2023cv01058 |
| July 12, 2023 |
| United States Federal Claims Court |
| Ryan T Holte |
| Miscellaneous - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 Mail Returned re: #18 Notice of Filing Transfer Case,, #19 Notice of Random Assignment, #20 Notice of Non-ECF Case, #21 General Order; Pro Se,,,. Document returned because: Return to Sender - Vacant - Unable to Forward. Mail sent to David Edward Brown. New address - 1859 ALAWEO ST., HONOLULU, HI 96821-1343 (tb) |
Filing 21
GENERAL ORDER No. 2022-01 dated 9/12/2022 continuing the suspension of paper filing requirements in pro se cases: Consistent with this court's General Orders issued on 3/18/2020, 11/13/2020, 12/23/2020, and 3/3/2021, it is ordered that judges, special masters, the Clerk of Court, and counsel of record for the United States may file electronically in pro se cases using the court's Case Management/Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system. Pro se litigants shall, absent extraordinary circumstances, submit all case filings via e-mail to ProSe_case_filings@cfc.uscourts.gov. Pro se litigants may, if feasible, receive notification by e-mail of all electronic filings by filing an E-Notification Consent Form, attached to the General Order. Signed by Chief Judge Elaine D. Kaplan. (hw1) Service on parties made. Modified on 7/12/2023 - Plaintiff served via U.S. mail. (hw1). Plaintiff served via first class mail on 08.15.2023 (mjk). Modified on 8/15/2023 (mjk).
|
| Filing 20 NOTICE of Non-ECF Case. (hw1) Modified on 7/12/2023 - Plaintiff served via U.S. mail. (hw1). Plaintiff served via first class mail on 08.15.2023 (mjk). Modified on 8/15/2023 (mjk). |
| Filing 19 Notice of Random Assignment Pursuant to Rule 40.1(a) to Judge Ryan T. Holte. (hw1) Modified on 7/12/2023 - Plaintiff served via U.S. mail. (hw1). Plaintiff served via first class mail on 08.15.2023 (mjk). Modified on 8/15/2023 (mjk). |
| Filing 18 There has been filed this day, on behalf of the parties, the record as transferred from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (Washington, DC), Case No.1:22-03170-JMC. Original File consisting of the entire case file transferred electronically via the CMECF Inter District Case Transfers. Transfer Complaint due by 8/9/2023. (Attachments: #1 Instructions for cases transferred from other district courts pursuant RCFC3.1) (hw1) Modified on 7/12/2023- Plaintiff served via U.S. mail. (hw1). Plaintiff served via first class mail on 08.15.2023 (mjk). Modified on 8/15/2023 (mjk). |
| Filing 17 CASE TRANSFERRED IN from District of District of Columbia. Case number 1:22-cv-03170. Original file, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Transfer Deadline by 7/4/2023. (zgf) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 7/12/2023.] |
|
Filing 16
ORDER re #6 Motion to Dismiss and 10 Motion to Transfer Case: The Court GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion to Transfer the Case. The Clerk of the Court shall transfer all papers in this proceeding, together with a certified copy of this Order, to the United States Court of Federal Claims. In addition, the Court DENIES the Motion to Dismiss as moot. See document for details. Signed by Judge Jia M. Cobb on May 5, 2023. (lcjmc3) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 7/12/2023.]
|
| Filing 15 Memorandum in opposition to re 10 Motion to Transfer Case filed by AVRIL HAINES. (See Docket Entry #14 to view document).(znmw) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 7/12/2023.] |
| Filing 14 REPLY to opposition to motion re #6 MOTION to Dismiss filed by AVRIL D. HAINES. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Text of Proposed Order, #4 Certificate of Service)(O'Tousa, Christina) Modified docket text on 4/5/2023 (znmw). [Transferred from District of Columbia on 7/12/2023.] |
|
MINUTE ORDER re #13 Plaintiff's Memorandum in Opposition to Motion for Extension: The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff's Memorandum. Having considered Plaintiff's arguments, the Court still concludes that Defendant has satisfied the good cause standard and that the requested extensions should be granted. See Minute Order, March 2, 2023. Signed by Judge Jia M. Cobb on March 7, 2023. (lcjmc3) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 7/12/2023.]
|
| Filing 13 Memorandum in opposition to re #11 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply, filed by DAVID EDWARD BROWN. (zed) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 7/12/2023.] |
|
MINUTE ORDER re #11 Motion for Extension of Time: The Court does not know Plaintiff's position on the Motion. Nonetheless, having considered the Motion, the Court finds that the good cause standard has been met. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the motion. Defendant is ORDERED to submit its Reply in support of its Motion to Dismiss #6 by March 28, 2023. Defendant is further ORDERED to submit its Response to the Motion to Transfer Venue 10 by March 28, 2023. Signed by Judge Jia M. Cobb on March 2, 2023. (lcjmc3) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 7/12/2023.]
|
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by AVRIL D. HAINES re #11 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to Motion to Transfer Venue . (O'Tousa, Christina) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 7/12/2023.] |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss, MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to Motion to Transfer Venue by AVRIL D. HAINES. (O'Tousa, Christina) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 7/12/2023.] |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Transfer Monetary Compensation Claims to the Court of Federal Claims by DAVID EDWARD BROWN. (See Docket Entry #9 to view document) (zjm) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 7/12/2023.] |
| Filing 9 RESPONSE re #6 MOTION to Dismiss filed by DAVID EDWARD BROWN. (Attachments: #1 Appendix 1, #2 Appendix 2)(zjm) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 7/12/2023.] |
|
MINUTE ORDER re #8 Consent Motion for Extension of Time: Having considered the motion and for good cause shown, the Court GRANTS the motion. Plaintiff is ORDERED to respond to the Motion to Dismiss #6 by March 3, 2023. Signed by Judge Jia M. Cobb on January 23, 2023. (lcjmc3) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 7/12/2023.]
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #6 MOTION to Dismiss by DAVID EDWARD BROWN. (znmw) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 7/12/2023.] |
|
Filing 7
FOX ORDER DIRECTING Plaintiff to respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 6) by February 17, 2023. Failure to respond by that date may result in the Court deeming the matter conceded. See document for details. Signed by Judge Jia M. Cobb on January 19, 2023. (lcjmc3) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 7/12/2023.]
|
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss by AVRIL D. HAINES. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Service)(O'Tousa, Christina) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 7/12/2023.] |
|
MINUTE ORDER re #5 Consent Motion for Extension of Time: Having considered the motion and for good cause shown, the Court GRANTS the motion. Defendant is ORDERED to respond to the Complaint by January 18, 2023. Signed by Judge Jia M. Cobb on December 15, 2022. (lcjmc3) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 7/12/2023.]
|
| Filing 5 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, with proposed order by AVRIL D. HAINES. (O'Tousa, Christina) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 7/12/2023.] |
| Filing 4 ERRATA by DAVID EDWARD BROWN re #2 Summons Returned Executed as to US Attorney, Summons Returned Executed as to U.S. Attorney General. (znmw) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 7/12/2023.] |
| Filing 3 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. AVRIL D. HAINES served on (no date on green card). (znmw) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 7/12/2023.] |
| Filing 2 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 10/20/2022. ( Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 12/19/2022.), RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 10/20/2022. (znmw) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 7/12/2023.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against AVRIL D. HAINES ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 203237) filed by DAVID EDWARD BROWN. (Attachments: #1 Appendix 1 Part 1, #2 Appendix 1 Part 2, #3 Appendix 1 Part 3, #4 Appendix 1 Part 4, #5 Appendix 1 Part 5, #6 Appendix 2 Part 1, #7 Appendix 2 Part 2, #8 Appendix 3, #9 Appendix 4, #10 Appendix 5, #11 Appendix 6, #12 Appendix 7, #13 Civil Cover Sheet)(znmw) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 7/12/2023.] |
| SUMMONS (3) Issued as to AVRIL D. HAINES, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (znmw) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 7/12/2023.] |
| Search for this case: BROWN v. US | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: DAVID EDWARD BROWN | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: USA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
