GRADY v. USA
| HEATHER D. GRADY |
| USA |
| 1:2023cv01148 |
| July 24, 2023 |
| United States Federal Claims Court |
| Carolyn N Lerner |
| Miscellaneous - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 Tucker Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CAFC Case Number 2023-2328 for #12 Notice of Appeal filed by HEATHER D. GRADY. (ac7) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF APPEAL, filed by HEATHER D. GRADY. Copy to CAFC. (ac7) |
| Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit re #12 Notice of Appeal. (ac7) |
| Filing 11 JUDGMENT entered, pursuant to Rule 58, dismissing plaintiff's complaint for lack of jurisdiction. (Service on parties made.) (dls) |
Filing 10
Order of Dismissal. Finding as Moot #9 Motion; granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment. Signed by Judge Carolyn N. Lerner. (saf) Service on parties made.
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Subpoena, filed by HEATHER D. GRADY. Response due by 8/29/2023. (Attachments: #1 Subpoena)(ac7) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Liridona Sinani for USA . (Sinani, Liridona) |
| Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against USA, filed by HEATHER D. GRADY. Amendment to #1 Complaint, filed by HEATHER D. GRADY. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by HEATHER D. GRADY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ac7) |
| Filing 6 Electronic Notification Consent Form. (ac7) |
|
Filing 5
GENERAL ORDER No. 2022-01 dated 9/12/2022 continuing the suspension of paper filing requirements in pro se cases: Consistent with this court's General Orders issued on 3/18/2020, 11/13/2020, 12/23/2020, and 3/3/2021, it is ordered that judges, special masters, the Clerk of Court, and counsel of record for the United States may file electronically in pro se cases using the court's Case Management/Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system. Pro se litigants shall, absent extraordinary circumstances, submit all case filings via e-mail to ProSe_case_filings@cfc.uscourts.gov. Pro se litigants may, if feasible, receive notification by e-mail of all electronic filings by filing an E-Notification Consent Form, attached to the General Order. (vds) Service on parties made. Plaintiff served via U.S. Mail on this day Modified on 7/26/2023 (vds).
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Non-ECF Case. (vds) Plaintiff served via U.S. Mail on this day Modified on 7/26/2023 (vds). |
| Filing 3 Notice of Random Assignment Pursuant to Rule 40.1(a) to Judge Carolyn N. Lerner. (vds) Plaintiff served via U.S. Mail on this day Modified on 7/26/2023 (vds). |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by HEATHER D. GRADY. Service: 7/24/2023. Response due by 8/7/2023.(vds) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against USA (O) (Copy Served Electronically on Department of Justice), filed by HEATHER D. GRADY. Answer due by 9/22/2023. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(vds) |
| Search for this case: GRADY v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: HEATHER D. GRADY | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: USA | |
| Represented By: | Liridona Sinani |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
