GOODWYN et al v. USA
| ZEKEQUELIN GOODWYN, LLOYD GOODWYN, ZEKEQUELIN R. GILBERT, KELLEY D. MEYER, KIRK V. MEYER, JOEL R. RAMIREZ, MAIRA RAMIREZ, LARRY C. SANCHEZ and DANNY VARGAS |
| USA |
| 1:2023cv01431 |
| August 24, 2023 |
| United States Federal Claims Court |
| Charles F Lettow |
| Taking - Addicks & Barker Reservoirs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 Tucker Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 (Copy) CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER issued on 2/1/2018 in sub-master docket 17-9001L. (tb) |
| Filing 4 (Copy of): AMENDED MANAGEMENT ORDER NO. 2 (ORDER REGARDING SUB-MASTER DOCKET FOR UPSTREAM CLAIMS) issued on 1/8/2019 in master docket 17-3000L. (tb) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Direct Assignment Pursuant to Rule 40.2(a) to Judge Charles F. Lettow. (tb) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Designation of Electronic Case. (tb) |
| Filing 1 UPSTREAM (SHORT FORM) COMPLAINT against USA (ARM) (Filing fee $402, Receipt number AUSFCC-8953780) (Copy Served Electronically on Department of Justice), filed by JOEL R. RAMIREZ, MAIRA RAMIREZ, DANNY VARGAS, ZEKEQUELIN GOODWYN, LARRY C. SANCHEZ, LLOYD GOODWYN, KELLEY D. MEYER, KIRK V. MEYER. (Attachments: #1 Supplement (Addendum A), #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(tb) |
| NOTICE: From this date and until further order of the court, all future filings in this case shall be made in Sub-Master Docket No. 17-9001L, In re Upstream Addicks and Barker (Texas) Flood-Control Reservoirs, assigned to the Honorable Charles F. Lettow. Co-Lead Counsel assigned to this Sub-Master Docket are: Armi Easterby at armi@easterbylaw.com, Daniel Charest at dcharest@burnscharest.com, Ian Heath Gershengorn at IGsershengorn@jenner.com, Charles Irvine at charles@irvineconner.com, Larry Vincent at lvincent@burnscharest.com, and Vuk Vujasinovic at vuk@vbattorneys.com. (tb) |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
