GIBSON v. USA
CURTIS GIBSON |
USA |
1:2023cv01512 |
August 30, 2023 |
United States Federal Claims Court |
Marian Blank Horn |
Contract - Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 Tucker Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Elinor Joung Kim for USA . (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Kim, Elinor) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Non-ECF Case. (vds) Plaintiff served via first class mail on 09.01.2023 (cam). Modified on 9/1/2023 (cam). |
Filing 2 Notice of Random Assignment Pursuant to Rule 40.1(a) to Judge Marian Blank Horn. (vds) Plaintiff served via first class mail on 09.01.2023 (cam). Modified on 9/1/2023 (cam). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against USA (ARM) (Filing fee $402, Receipt number CFC1000XXXX) (Copy Served Electronically on Department of Justice), filed by CURTIS GIBSON. Answer due by 10/30/2023. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Supplement Mailing Envelope)(vds) |
Search for this case: GIBSON v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: CURTIS GIBSON | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: USA | |
Represented By: | Elinor Joung Kim |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.