DOE NO. 1 v. USA
| DOE NO. 1 |
| USA |
| 1:2023cv01888 |
| October 26, 2023 |
| United States Federal Claims Court |
| David A Tapp |
| Civilian Pay - FLSA |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 Tucker Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Notice of Random Assignment Pursuant to Rule 40.1(a) to Judge David A. Tapp. (ypb) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Designation of Electronic Case. (ypb) |
| Filing 2 **SEALED** MOTION for Protective Order, filed by DOE NO. 1. Service: 10/26/2027.Response due by 11/9/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit E)(ypb) |
| Filing 1 **SEALED**COMPLAINT against USA (DOJ) (Filing fee $402, Receipt number USFCC-9110466) (Copy Served Electronically on Department of Justice), filed by DOE NO. 1.Answer due by 12/26/2023. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A)(ypb) |
| Search for this case: DOE NO. 1 v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: DOE NO. 1 | |
| Represented By: | Daniel M. Rosenthal |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: USA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
