DIDLEY v. USA
| SOPHIA DIDLEY |
| USA |
| 1:2023cv01901 |
| October 27, 2023 |
| United States Federal Claims Court |
| Stephen S Schwartz |
| Civilian Pay - Back Pay |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 Tucker Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time until 2/26/2024 to File Answer re #1 Complaint, , filed by USA.Response due by 1/4/2024.(Rolfe, Matney) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Matney Elizabeth Rolfe for USA . (Rolfe, Matney) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Designation of Electronic Case. (ew) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Random Assignment Pursuant to Rule 40.1(a) to Judge Stephen S. Schwartz. (ew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against USA (VA) (Filing fee $402, Receipt number AUSFCC-9113169) (Copy Served Electronically on Department of Justice), filed by SOPHIA DIDLEY.Answer due by 12/26/2023. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ew) |
| Search for this case: DIDLEY v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: SOPHIA DIDLEY | |
| Represented By: | Ibidun Roberts |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: USA | |
| Represented By: | Matney Elizabeth Rolfe |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
