ABDUSH-SHAKUR v. USA
SHAKIR ABDUSH-SHAKUR and LEONARD SCOTT CUNNIGHAM |
USA |
1:2023cv01937 |
October 30, 2023 |
United States Federal Claims Court |
Edward H Meyers |
Miscellaneous - Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 Tucker Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) , filed by USA.Response due by 1/17/2024.(Aradi, Laura) |
Filing 6 Mail Returned re: #2 Notice of Random Assignment, #3 Notice of Non-ECF Case, #4 Notice of Filing Fee. Document returned because: Refused- Unable to Forward. Mail sent to Shakir Abdush-Shaker. (py) Re-mailed on 12/5/2023 and included prisoner ID number (py). Plaintiff served via first class mail on 12.05.2023 (cam). Modified on 12/5/2023 (cam). |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Laura Offenbacher Aradi for USA . (Aradi, Laura) |
Filing 4 **FILING FEE DUE.** Our records indicate that a filing fee has not been received. Plaintiff must submit either the required filing fee of $402.00 OR an application to proceed in forma pauperis, which can be located under the forms link at: #www.uscfc.uscourts.gov. Please contact the Clerk's Office at 202-357-6406 for any additional assistance. (py) Plaintiff served via first class mail on 11.03.2023 (cam). Modified on 11/3/2023 (cam). |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Non-ECF Case. (py) Plaintiff served via first class mail on 11.03.2023 (cam). Modified on 11/3/2023 (cam). |
Filing 2 Notice of Random Assignment Pursuant to Rule 40.1(a) to Judge Edward H. Meyers. Modified on 11/3/2023 to add document(py). Plaintiff served via first class mail on 11.03.2023 (cam). Modified on 11/3/2023 (cam). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against USA (DOJ) (Copy Served Electronically on Department of Justice), filed by SHAKIR SHAKUR-ABDUSH. Answer due by 1/2/2024. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplement Mailing Envelope)(py) |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.