SHERIDAN ASSOCIATES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v. USA
| SHERIDAN ASSOCIATES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP |
| USA |
| 1:2023cv02188 |
| December 28, 2023 |
| United States Federal Claims Court |
| Thompson M Dietz |
| Contract - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 Tucker Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Joshua A. Mandlebaum for USA . (Mandlebaum, Joshua) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Designation of Electronic Case. (sh) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Random Assignment Pursuant to Rule 40.1(a) to Judge Thompson M. Dietz. (sh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SHERIDAN ASSOCIATES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (AGR) (Filing fee $405, Receipt number AUSFCC-9245490) (Copy Served Electronically on Department of Justice), filed by SHERIDAN ASSOCIATES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP. Answer due by 2/26/2024. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(sh) |
| Search for this case: SHERIDAN ASSOCIATES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: SHERIDAN ASSOCIATES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP | |
| Represented By: | Jeff Howard Eckland |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: USA | |
| Represented By: | Joshua A. Mandlebaum |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
