QUANTUM SEMICONDUCTOR, LLC v. USA
QUANTUM SEMICONDUCTOR, LLC |
USA |
1:2024cv00146 |
January 30, 2024 |
United States Federal Claims Court |
Elaine D Kaplan |
Contract - Service (CDA) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 Tucker Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss pursuant to Rules 12 (b)(1) and (6) , filed by USA.Response due by 4/26/2024.(Kuan, Nelson) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Nelson Kuan for USA . (Kuan, Nelson) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Designation of Electronic Case. (vds) |
Filing 2 Notice of Random Assignment Pursuant to Rule 40.1(a) to Chief Judge Elaine D. Kaplan. (vds) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against USA (NAV) (Filing fee $405, Receipt number AUSFCC-9313750) (Copy Served Electronically on Department of Justice), filed by QUANTUM SEMICONDUCTOR, LLC. Answer due by 4/1/2024. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(vds) |
Search for this case: QUANTUM SEMICONDUCTOR, LLC v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: QUANTUM SEMICONDUCTOR, LLC | |
Represented By: | Daniel H Ramish |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: USA | |
Represented By: | Nelson Kuan |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.