WILLIAMS v. USA
SEBASTIAN WILLIAMS |
USA |
1:2024cv00290 |
February 23, 2024 |
United States Federal Claims Court |
Carolyn N Lerner |
Charles F Lettow |
Unjust conviction and Imprisonment |
28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Matney Elizabeth Rolfe for USA . (Rolfe, Matney) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Reassignment. Case reassigned to Judge Carolyn N. Lerner for all further proceedings. Judge Charles F. Lettow no longer assigned to the case. (tb) |
|
Filing 3 NOTICE of Designation of Electronic Case. (tb) |
Filing 2 Notice of Random Assignment Pursuant to Rule 40.1(a) to Judge Charles F. Lettow. (tb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against USA (DOJ) (Filing fee $405, Receipt number AUSFCC-9370877) (Copy Served Electronically on Department of Justice), filed by SEBASTIAN WILLIAMS. Answer due by 4/23/2024.(tb) |
Search for this case: WILLIAMS v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: SEBASTIAN WILLIAMS | |
Represented By: | Kenechukwu C Okoli |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: USA | |
Represented By: | Matney Elizabeth Rolfe |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.