MADDOX v. USA
GARY EUGENE MADDOX, JR. |
USA |
1:2024cv00742 |
May 10, 2024 |
United States Federal Claims Court |
Ryan T Holte |
Miscellaneous - Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 Tucker Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Bryan Michael Byrd for USA . (Byrd, Bryan) |
Filing 4 Notice of Random Assignment Pursuant to Rule 40.1(a) to Judge Ryan T. Holte. Plaintiff served via First Class mail on 5/15/24. (tb) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Non-ECF Case. Plaintiff served via First Class mail on 5/15/24. (tb) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by GARY EUGENE MADDOX, JR. Service: 5/10/24. Response due by 5/27/2024.(tb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against USA (O) (Copy Served Electronically on Department of Justice), filed by GARY EUGENE MADDOX, JR. Answer due by 7/13/2024. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(tb) Modified on 5/14/2024 to correct answer due date (tb). |
Search for this case: MADDOX v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: GARY EUGENE MADDOX, JR. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: USA | |
Represented By: | Bryan Michael Byrd |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.