HERSEE et al v. USA
STEPHEN D. HERSEE and JANE S.K. MILLS |
USA |
1:2024cv00997 |
June 28, 2024 |
United States Federal Claims Court |
Armando O Bonilla |
Tax - Income, Individual |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 Tucker Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER granting #7 defendant's unopposed motion for an enlargement of time. Defendant shall FILE an answer or dispositive motion to plaintiff's complaint on or before October 25, 2024. Signed by Judge Armando O. Bonilla. (ead) Service on parties made. |
Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time until 10/25/2024 to File Answer re #1 Complaint, , filed by USA.Response due by 9/4/2024.(Van Dam, Emily) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Emily J Van Dam for USA . (Van Dam, Emily) |
Filing 5 ORDER granting plaintiffs' #4 motion for leave to file under seal. The Clerk of Court is directed to FILE by leave of the Court plaintiffs' motion for leave to file under seal (ECF 4) and the unredacted attachments (ECF 4-2, 4-3, and 4-4). Signed by Judge Armando O. Bonilla. (ead) Service on parties made. |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to File Complaint and Unredacted Exhibits A & B, MOTION to Seal Document #1 Complaint, Unredacted Exhibits A & B, filed by All Plaintiffs.Response due by 7/12/2024. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplement Complaint, #3 Exhibit Unredacted Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit Unredacted Exhibit B)(Amin, Meeren) FILED BY LEAVE OF THE COURT. (py). |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Designation of Electronic Case. (py) |
Filing 2 Notice of Random Assignment Pursuant to Rule 40.1(a) to Judge Armando O. Bonilla. (py) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against USA (TRE) (Filing fee $405, Receipt number AUSFCC-9665225) (Copy Served Electronically on Department of Justice), filed by STEPHEN D. HERSEE, JANE S.K. MILLS. Answer due by 8/27/2024. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B)(py) |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.