RUHBAYAN v. USA
RAJUL RUHBAYAN |
USA |
1:2024cv01136 |
July 25, 2024 |
United States Federal Claims Court |
Molly R Silfen |
Unjust conviction and Imprisonment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 Tucker Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 NOTICE of Non-ECF Case. (ac7) |
Filing 3 Notice of Random Assignment Pursuant to Rule 40.1(a) to Judge Molly R. Silfen (ac7). |
Filing 2 **FILING FEE DUE.** Our records indicate that a filing fee has not been received. Plaintiff must submit either the required filing fee OR, if appropriate, an application to proceed in forma pauperis, which can be located under the forms link at: #www.uscfc.uscourts.gov. Please contact the Clerk's Office at 202-357-6406 for any additional assistance. (ac7) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against USA (VAR) (Copy Served Electronically on Department of Justice), filed by RAJUL RUHBAYAN. Answer due by 9/23/2024. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Envelope) (ac7) |
Search for this case: RUHBAYAN v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: RAJUL RUHBAYAN | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: USA | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.