Smith v. Bartalotta et al
Plaintiff: Robert Augustus Smith
Defendant: Mrs. H. Bartalotta
Case Number: 2:2008cv00628
Filed: August 8, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office: Ft. Myers Office
County: Charlotte
Presiding Judge: Sheri Polster Chappell
Presiding Judge: John E. Steele
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 13, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 20 OPINION AND ORDER granting 16 Motion to dismiss and the case is dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly, terminate any pending motions, and close the case. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 4/13/2009. (RKM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Bartalotta et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Augustus Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mrs. H. Bartalotta
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?