Michael James, LLC v. Pine Ridge Imports of Naples, Inc. et al
Michael James, LLC |
Pine Ridge Imports of Naples, Inc., Richard E. Bravieri, Margret J. Bravieri, Various John Does, Various Jane Does and ABC Companies |
2:2008cv00716 |
September 18, 2008 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Trademark Office |
Collier |
Sheri Polster Chappell |
Unassigned Judge |
None |
Federal Question |
15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 194 ORDER granting 191 the Motion by Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Michael James, LLC, d/b/a Pine Ridge Coachworks and Third Party Defendant Michael Bauer to Extend the Expert Disclosure Deadlines. Plaintiffs shall disclose experts by September 15, 2010. Defendants shall disclose experts by September 24, 2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 7/22/2010. (LMH) |
Filing 186 ORDER granting 184 Plaintiff Michael James, LLC, d/b/a/ Pine Ridge Coachworks and Third Party Defendant Michael Bauers Motion for an Extension of Time to Respond to Discovery. The parties are granted an extension of 14 days within which to respond to Third-Party Defendant Naples Body & Fenders discovery served on June 11, 2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 7/13/2010. (LMH) |
Filing 178 ORDER denying 157 Defendants' Motion for Clarification of Court Order Pertaining to Defendants Amended Motion to Compel Discovery ; denying 165 Defendants' Second Motion to Compel Documents Responsive to Requests for Production ; denyi ng as moot 166 Defendants' Motion to File a Reply to the Plaintiffs Opposition to the Defendants' Motion for Clarification of the Courts Order Pertaining to Discovery. Defendants' request for attorneys' fees incurred in filing t he motion is also DENIED, but the Court issues a cautionary note to the parties that an award of costs against a party could be ordered in the future for any tactics that the Court feels obstructs meaningful discovery. SEE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS AND DETAILS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 6/10/2010. (LMH) |
Filing 169 ORDER. The Parties Counsel shall appear in person before the undersigned at the United States Courthouse and Federal Building, Courtroom 5-D, 2110 First Street, Fort Myers, Florida, on June 9, 2010, at 9:30am for a discovery hearing. All outstandin g discovery is to be brought with Counsel to the hearing and the Parties shall be prepared to make arguments regarding their respective positions on any and all outstanding discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 5/25/2010. (LMH) |
Filing 155 PROTECTIVE ORDER OF CONFIDENTIALITY. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 3/30/2010. (LMH) |
Filing 150 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 143 the Defendants, Margret J., and Michael Bravieris Motion to Enlarge the Case Management and Scheduling Order Deadlines and/or Stay Discovery; denying as moot 148 The Defendants, Margaret and Richard Bravieri filed a Motion to file a Reply to Plaintiffs Opposition to Defendants Motion to Extend Discovery. (1) The Defendants, Margret J., and Michael Bravieris Motion to Enlarge the Case Management and Scheduling Order Deadlines is GRANTED. (2) The Defendants, Margret J., and Michael Bravieris Motion Stay Discovery is DENIED. SEE ORDER FOR AMENDED DEADLINES. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 3/18/2010. (LMH) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.