BERRY v. BUTTERWORTH, ET AL.
| Bruce Berry |
| Robert Butterworth, Timothy Budz and State Of Florida |
| 2:2009cv00333 |
| May 21, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Ft. Myers Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Sheri Polster Chappell |
| John E. Steele |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
ORDER ADOPTING 10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus is transferred to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 5/21/2009. (jcw) [Transferred from flnd on 5/21/2009.]
|
|
Filing
10
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by BRUCE BERRY : It is recommended Petitioner's petition be TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. Petition er is not incarcerated in this district, the Court is without jurisdiction to proceed, and transfer to the appropriate forum for further proceedings is required. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ALLAN KORNBLUM on 4/8/2009. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 5/7/2009. (jws) Modified on 5/7/2009 to correct file date to reflect signature date of 4/8/09 (tea). [Transferred from flnd on 5/21/2009.]
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
