Newman v. Sun Capital, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Daniel S. Newman
Defendant: Sun Capital, Inc., Sun Capital Healthcare, Inc. and HLP Properties of Port Arthur, LLC
Case Number: 2:2009cv00445
Filed: July 14, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office: Ft. Myers Office
County: Dade
Presiding Judge: Sheri Polster Chappell
Presiding Judge: Unassigned Judge
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 0078 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 19, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 347 ORDER granting 346 Plaintiff's Motion to Extend Order Governing the Use of Confidential Discovery Information Dated March 18, 2010 [D.E. 178]. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carol Mirando on 4/19/2017. (HJ)
August 28, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 308 AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER granting 306 Joint Motion for Approval of Revised Settlement Agreement and Amendment of May 17 Opinion and Order. The Court finds the revised Settlement Agreement is fair, reasonable, and adequate, and therefore approves the revised Settlement Agreement. The Court's Prior Opinion and Order 304 is hereby SUPERCEDED by this Opinion and Order. The Joint Motion for Expedited Approval of Proposed Procedure to Obtain Court Approval of the Proposed Settlement Trans action 248 is GRANTED to the extent the Court has approved the settlement agreement as revised. The Receiver and other parties are authorized to proceed to effectuate the settlement transaction in accordance with the revised Settlement Agreement. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over all matters relating to the enforcement of the Settlement Agreement and other Transaction Documents. See Revised Opinion and Order for details. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 8/28/2012. (SVC)
May 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 304 OPINION AND ORDER withholding approval of the Settlement Agreement. The Court will not approve those portions of the Settlement Agreement which seek to discourage cooperation with law enforcement officials. The parties shall have thirty (30) days t o revise those provisions of the Settlement Agreement which discourage cooperation with law enforcement officials, or to inform the Court they decline to do so. Objections may be filed within thirty (30) days of the filing of the changes or the notice that no changes will be made, LIMITED ONLY TO THIS PROPOSED MODIFICATION. See Opinion and Order for details. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 5/17/2012. (SVC)
February 28, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 282 ORDER granting 277 The Parties Joint Motion to Seal any Responses to Objecting Investors Seal Confidential Settlement and Request for Additional Time to File Same (Doc. #277) is GRANTED and counsel may file the proposed documents under seal with t he Clerk of Court. The documents will be maintained under seal until February 28, 2013, after which date the documents will be destroyed without further notice. On or before that date, counsel for the Parties filing the Motion may request that the documents be returned.The Parties shall have up to and including March 2, 2012 to file any responses to the sealed Confidential Settlement. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 2/28/2012. (LMH)
February 9, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 236 OPINION AND ORDER denying 216 Motion to intervene; adopting and incorporating 229 Report and Recommendations; denying request for sanctions. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 2/9/2011. (RKR)
November 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 210 ORDER granting 209 the Receivers and Sun Capital's Joint Emergency Motions (1) to File the Parties' Next Joint Notice of Settlement Under Seal and (2) to Extend the Stay and Reporting Deadline to and through November 29, 2010. The stay and reporting deadline is extended through and including November 29, 2010. The next joint notice on settlement may be filed under seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 11/22/2010. (LMH)
May 17, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 193 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 159 motion to amend/correct; adopting Report and Recommendations re 181 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 5/17/2010. (RMT)
April 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 186 ORDER granting 184 the Receiver, Daniel S. Newman's Unopposed Motion to File Under Seal Pursuant to Confidentiality Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 4/22/2010. (LMH)
March 18, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 178 ORDER Governing the Use of Confidential Discovery Information. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 3/18/2010. (LMH)
February 4, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 154 ORDER denying 149 the Defendants' Emergency Motion to Compel the Production of Documents. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 2/4/2010. (LMH)
January 21, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 148 OPINION AND ORDER denying 30 Motion to intervene; adopting 103 Report and Recommendations; and overruling objections. The Clerk shall terminate the movants on the docket. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 1/21/2010. (RKR)
January 16, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 122 ORDER denying 90 Receiver, Daniel S. Newman's Emergency Motion to Compel the Production of Documents from Defendants and Affiliates. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 1/16/2010. (Chappell, Sheri)
December 11, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 103 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 30 the MOTION to intervene filed by Theodore S. Fries, Belmont Strategic Income Fund, LP, The Rock of Gainesville, Inc., Kenny Allan Troutt, Edward D. Fallin, Jr., Annandale Partners, LP, Donald L. Hampton, Barbara K. Baldwin, Annandale Partners II, LP. It is respectfully recommended the Investor Intervenors Annadale Partners, LP., Annadale Partners II, LP., Barbara K. Baldwin, Belmont Strategic Income Fund, LP. Edward E. Fallin, Jr., Theodore S. Fries, Donald L . Hampton, Kenny Allan Troutt, as trustee, on behalf of the Kenny Allan Troutt Descendants Trust, and the Rock of Gainesville, Inc.s (Intervenors) Motion to Intervene (Doc. #30) should be DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 12/11/2009. (LMH)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Newman v. Sun Capital, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel S. Newman
Represented By: Michael D. Magidson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sun Capital, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sun Capital Healthcare, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HLP Properties of Port Arthur, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?