Puello v. Eagle Concrete Systems, Inc. et al
| Ivanonna Puello |
| Eagle Concrete Systems, Inc., Michael J. Leannah and Carmel M. Leannah |
| 2:2009cv00485 |
| July 27, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Ft. Myers Office |
| Lee |
| Sheri Polster Chappell |
| Unassigned Judge |
| Plaintiff |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
ORDER adopting 35 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. The Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement Agreement and for Entry of Final Judgment 34 is GRANTED as to Defendant Eagle Concrete Systems, Inc., ONLY. The settlement reached constitutes a fair and reasonable resolution of dispute. Plaintiff Ivanonna Puello is entitled to recover from Defendant Eagle Concrete Systems, Inc. the sum of $7,029.76 on principal, $5,000.00 for attorney's fees, and $470.24 for costs. Total award is $12,500.00, which shall bear interest at the legal rate. The Clerk is directed to terminate any pending motions/deadlines and enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff Ivanonna Puello in the amount of $12,500.00 and against Defendant Eagle Concrete Systems, Inc., ONLY. Signed by Judge Charlene E. Honeywell on 8/9/2011. (BGS)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER denying as moot 22 The Plaintiff, Ivanona Puello's Motion to Compel the Plaintiff's First Set of Interrogatories. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 9/24/2010. (LMH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
