Crim v. Manalich et al
| Robert Brian Crim |
| Ramiro Manalich, David Robert Weisse, Harry Heist, Bayshore of Naples, L.P, Arboretum Development, LLC, The Clerk of Courts for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, State of Florida and Unknown named Employee of the Clerk of Courts for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, State of Florida |
| 2:2009cv00736 |
| November 6, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Ft. Myers Office |
| Collier |
| Sheri Polster Chappell |
| John E. Steele |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
OPINION AND ORDER denying 31 Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis/affidavit of indigency; adopting 32 Report and Recommendations. The case is dismissed without prejudice as to the remaining defendants. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly, and pursuant to 22 Opinion and Order, and close the file. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 2/11/2011. (RKR)
|
|
Filing
22
OPINION AND ORDER denying as moot 20 Motion to dismiss; granting 21 Motion to dismiss and defendant Ramiro Manalich is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk shall withhold the entry of dismissal until the conclusion of the case but terminate this defendant on the docket. Plaintiff shall show cause within 14 days why all remaining defendants should not be dismissed for failure to serve process. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 7/13/2010. (RKR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
