Chen v. DeSoto County, Florida
Guang Chen |
DeSoto County, Florida |
2:2009cv00752 |
November 16, 2009 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Ft. Myers Office |
Charlotte |
Sheri Polster Chappell |
Unassigned Judge |
Plaintiff |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Race) |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 66 ORDER denying 64 Plaintiff's Second Motion to Compel Answers to Discovery ; denying 65 Plaintiff's Motion Seeking Court's Leave to File Plaintiff's Response to Defendant DeSoto County's Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint and Plaintiff's Response to Defendant Jason Green's Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 10/26/2010. (LMH) |
Filing 63 ORDER granting 53 The Defendant DeSoto County has up to and including November 5, 2010, to produce verified answers and production to the Plaintiff's Second Interrogatories, Request for Production, and Request for Admissions. The Plaintiff, Guang Chen's Motion for Sanctions is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 10/25/2010. (LMH) |
Filing 62 ORDER granting 59 Defendant DeSoto County's Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (Doc. #54) is hereby striken. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 10/21/2010. (LMH) |
Filing 56 ORDER denying 55 The Plaintiff Guang Chen's Motion to Dismiss the Defendant's Answer and Affirmative Defenses to the Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint Motion to Have a Default Judgment to Defendant Desoto Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 10/5/2010. (LMH) |
Filing 45 ORDER granting 44 the Defendant's Motion to Strike Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 8/30/2010. (LMH) |
Filing 35 ORDER denying 32 the Plaintiff, Guang Chens Motion to Compel Rule 26 Disclosures. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 4/26/2010. (LMH) |
Filing 27 ORDER granting 26 The Defendant's Motion to Compel Completion of Case Management Report and Selection of Mediator. The Plaintiff shall have seven (7) days to select a mediator from the list of names provided, or the Court will have no other option but to select one on his behalf. The Clerk is directed to accept the Case Management Report outlining the proposed dates attached to the Motion and enter a Case Management Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 4/2/2010. (LMH) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Chen v. DeSoto County, Florida | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Guang Chen | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: DeSoto County, Florida | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.