Palmer v. Monroe et al
| LeSamuel Palmer |
| Lt. Monroe, Officer Gjerde, C. Gallagher, J. Bracy, Dr. Hemphill, A. Walker, M. Kraus, D. Conigilio, A. Johnson and Secretary, DOC |
| 2:2010cv00098 |
| February 12, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Ft. Myers Office |
| Charlotte |
| Sheri Polster Chappell |
| Charlene E. Honeywell |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
100
ORDER granting 90 Defendant Hemphill's Motion for Reconsideration or, Alternatively, Motion to Certify Under Rule 54(b), Fed. R. Civ. P. The Court vacates its March 10, 2011 Order 67 and grants Defendant Hemphill's Motion for Costs [5 8] ; denying as moot 90 Defendant's Motion to Certify Appeal; granting 99 Defendant Bracy's Motion to Tax Costs. Plaintiff is hereby taxed costs totaling $43.45 ($16.20 for Defendant Hemphill and $27.25 for Defendant Bracy). Plaintiff shall make payments for these costs to Defendants pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1915(f)(2)(B). The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Charlene E. Honeywell on 10/5/2011. (BGS)
|
|
Filing
97
OPINION AND ORDER. Defendant Bracy's Motion to Sanction 89 and Second Motion to Sanction Plaintiff 94 are GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to STRIKE Plaintiff's Declaration of Officer Snider (Doc. 88-4 at 17) and STRIKE the Declaration of inmate Coleman (Doc. 88-4 at 25-27). Plaintiff knowingly, or with reckless disregard for the truth, brought false information or evidence before this Court. The Court strongly recommends that Plaintiff be subject to disciplinary procedures purs uant to the rules of the Department of Corrections. The Clerk is directed to mail a certified copy of this Order to the Warden at Florida State Prison so that disciplinary procedures pursuant to the rules of the Department of Corrections, as provide d in Section 944.09, Fla. Stat., may be instituted. The Court construes Plaintiff's Motion to Sanction 95 to be Plaintiff's response to Defendant's second motion to sanction. Plaintiff's Motion to Sanction is DENIED, as it is without merit. Defendant Bracy's Motion for Summary Judgment 62 is GRANTED. The Complaint is dismissed with prejudice as to Defendant Bracy. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and CLOSE this case. Defendant Hemphill's motion for reconsideration 90 shall remain pending. Signed by Judge Charlene E. Honeywell on 9/9/2011. (BGS)
|
|
Filing
56
OPINION AND ORDER. Defendant Hemphill's Motion for Summary Judgment 44 is GRANTED. Defendant Hemphill is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and edit the caption of the case. Signed by Judge Charlene E. Honeywell on 1/27/2011. (BGS)
|
|
Filing
54
OPINION AND ORDER. The Motion to Dismiss 33 is filed on behalf of Defendant Gallagher, Bracy, and Gjerde is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The motion is GRANTED with respect to the claims against Defendants Gallagher and Gjerde and the Defe ndants Gallagher and Gjerde are DISMISSED without prejudice. The motion is DENIED with respect to Defendant Bracy, in his individual capacity only. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment and correct the caption of the case accordingly. Defendant Bracy shall file his Answer and Affirmative Defenses within TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS from the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Charlene E. Honeywell on 1/26/2011. (BGS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
