Nadreau et al v. Lush Cosmetics NY, LLC
| Seth Nadreau, Robert Wade Whitmer, Jennifer Shakan, Kim Pearce, Shaun Gillies and Catalina Hernandez |
| Lush Cosmetics NY, LLC |
| 2:2010cv00298 |
| May 7, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Ft. Myers Office |
| Lee |
| Charlene E. Honeywell |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
101
ORDER adopting 99 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; denying 74 MOTION to Certify Rule 23 Sub-Class as to Count II of Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge John Antoon II on 9/5/2012. (BRS)
|
|
Filing
91
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 89 Defendants Lush Cosmetics, LLC and Lush Cosmetics NY, LLC's Motion to Compel Answers to Defendants' Third Interrogatories Directed to Plaintiffs, Certification of Counsel Conference and Motio n for Attorneys' Fees. Defendants motion to compel all 36 opt-in Plaintiffs to respond to Defendants' Third Interrogatories Directed to Plaintiffs is GRANTED. Defendants' request for attorneys' fees is DENIED.Plaintiffs' Combined Motion to Deem Objection to Defendants' Third Interrogatories Timely 90 is GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 5/10/2012. (LMH)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER granting 30 the Parties' Joint Motion for Counsel to Meet Telephonically to Prepare and File a Case Management Report. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 7/12/2010. (LMH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
