Howard v. Kraus et al
| Johnnie Fitzgerald Howard |
| C. Kraus, D. Snider, M. H. Meier, S. M. Leahey, D. Adams, J.W. Licata, FNU Severson, K. Williams, B. Mount, C. England, J. Adams, R. McCracken, P. Skipper, T. Reid and A. L. Johnson |
| 2:2010cv00434 |
| July 12, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Ft. Myers Office |
| Union |
| Sheri Polster Chappell |
| Charlene E. Honeywell |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
70
OPINION AND ORDER. The Defendant's motion for taxation of costs 62 is DENIED as moot. Plaintiff's motion for relief from judgment 63 is GRANTED. The Court vacates its February 16, 2011 Order. Plaintiff's second motion for reli ef from judgment 65 and third motion for relief from judgment 69 are DENIED as moot. The Clerk is directed to vacate the judgment entered on February 17, 2011. Further, the Clerk shall reopen this action. Defendant shall file an answer, or oth erwise file a response, to Plaintiff's Complaint within TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS from the date on this Order. Plaintiff's motion for sanctions 66 is DENIED. The Clerk shall strike Plaintiff's improperly filed reply 68 . Signed by Judge Charlene E. Honeywell on 11/15/2011. (BGS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
