Lewis v. Charlotte Correctional Institution Employees et al
Jonathan K. Lewis |
Charlotte Correctional Institution Employees, A. Tomlinson, Mr. Morgan, Mr. Hummel, C. Englund, Colonel Snider, Major Anderson, Mr. Vartian, Marta Villacorta, J. Adams and Secretary, DOC |
2:2010cv00547 |
September 3, 2010 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Ft. Myers Office |
Union |
John E. Steele |
Douglas N. Frazier |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 181 OPINION AND ORDER granting 145 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. All official capacity claims for monetary damages are dismissed with prejudice; all other claims are dismissed for failure to state a claim; with no remaining claims o r defendants, the case is dismissed. Alternatively, the Third Amended Complaint is dismissed as a sanction for abuse of the judicial process. See Opinion and Order for details. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly, terminate any pending motions (terminated: 180 Motion for Reconsideration), and close the case. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 9/19/2013. (RKR) |
Filing 43 ORDER denying 33 Motion for reconsideration, construed as brought pursuant to Rule 59(e). The Clerk of Court shall forward a civil rights complaint form to Plaintiff with this Order for Plaintiff's use. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 1/12/2011. (RKR) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.