Peoples Gas System v. Posen Construction, Inc.
| Peoples Gas System |
| Posen Construction, Inc. |
| Posen Construction, Inc. |
| Peoples Gas System |
| 2:2011cv00231 |
| April 20, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Ft. Myers Office |
| Hillsborough |
| Sheri Polster Chappell |
| John E. Steele |
| Other Personal Property Damage |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
ORDER granting 49 the Plaintiff, Peoples Gas System and the Defendant, Posen Construction, Inc.'s Motion to Enlarge Scheduling Order Deadlines. SEE ORDER FOR DEADLINES. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 11/5/2012. (LMF)
|
|
Filing
37
OPINION AND ORDER granting 27 Motion to dismiss Count III of the Amended Counterclaim and Count III of the Amended Counterclaim is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk shall withhold the entry of judgment until the conclusion of the case. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 6/20/2012. (RKR)
|
|
Filing
23
OPINION AND ORDER granting 16 Motion to dismiss; denying as moot 16 Motion to strike; denying as moot 16 Motion for more definite statement. Counts III, IV, and V of the 8 Counterclaims are dismissed without prejudice with leave to file amended counterclaims within 21 days of this Opinion and Order. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 11/14/2011. (RKR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
