Hill v. Lee County Sheriff's Office et al
Plaintiff: Eddie S Hill
Defendant: Mike Scott, Lee County Sheriff's Office, Jack Long, Barbara Berg and Jonathan Washer
Case Number: 2:2011cv00242
Filed: April 27, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office: Ft. Myers Office
County: Sarasota
Presiding Judge: Sheri Polster Chappell
Presiding Judge: John E. Steele
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 14, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 115 OPINION AND ORDER granting 98 motion to dismiss and in the alternative Motion for summary judgment. Count I, to the extent it asserts a claim against the Lee County Sheriff's Office is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Counts II through IV, to the extent they assert a Section 1983 claim other than false arrest are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Counts I through IV, to the extent they assert claims against the individually named defendants in their official capacities are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Summary judgment as to Counts I through IV is GRANTED in favor of defendants Community Service Aid Jack Long, Detective Barbara Berg, Sergeant Jonathan Walker, and Sheriff Mike Scott and against plaintiff Eddie Snyder Hill. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly, terminate all pending motions and deadlines, and close the file. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 8/14/2013. (SVC)
August 13, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 114 OPINION AND ORDER granting 97 motion to dismiss. Counts IV and V of the Second Amended Complaint 96 are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 8/13/2013. (SVC)
September 24, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 86 OPINION AND ORDER granting 44 Motion to dismiss and in the alternative, Motion for summary judgment and granting 66 Motion to dismiss. The Complaint is dismissed in its entirety pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) or Rule 56 as set forth in the Opinion and Order. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly as set forth in paragraphs three (3) through five (5) of the Opinion and Order, terminate all pending motions and deadlines, and close the file. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 9/24/2012. (SVC)
September 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 85 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 84 Defendants' Unopposed Motion to Postpone Mediation and to Attend Telephonically. Defendants, EverBank and Frank Heinz's, request to postpone mediation until the Court rules on their pending Motions to Dismiss is GRANTED. The Parties are to set a mediation date within twenty (20) days of the Court ruling on the Motions to Dismiss and advise the Court. Defendant, EverBank's, request to appear at mediation telephonically is DENIED without prejudice as premature. Defendant may move again if and when mediation is set. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 9/17/2012. (LMF)
July 5, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 78 ORDER denying 74 Plaintiff, Eddie S. Hill's Motion Directing the United States Attorney's Office to Fulfill their Obligation to Zealously and Effectively Prosecute for the Crimes of Conspiracy [and] Perjury 74 is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 7/5/2012. (LMH)
July 3, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 76 ORDER. The Plaintiff Eddie S. Hill must file a Notice of Change of Address with the Court on or before July 13, 2012. Failure to comply with Court's Order may result in the Plaintiff's case being dismissed pursuant to Local Rule 3.01(a). Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 7/3/2012. (LMH)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hill v. Lee County Sheriff's Office et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mike Scott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lee County Sheriff's Office
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jack Long
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Barbara Berg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jonathan Washer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Eddie S Hill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?