Carroll-Brufsky et al v. The E.W. Scripps Company et al
Allen D. Brufsky and Marcia Carroll-Brufsky |
U.S. Bank, N.A. and The E.W. Scripps Company |
2:2011cv00500 |
September 2, 2011 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Ft. Myers Office |
Collier |
Charlene E. Honeywell |
Douglas N. Frazier |
Assault, Libel, and Slander |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 61 ORDER denying without prejudice 60 Motion to enforce settlement, for lack of jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Elizabeth A. Kovachevich on 6/19/2013. (JM) |
Filing 43 ORDER: Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend 40 is GRANTED. Plaintiffs shall file their amended complaint within 14 days. The Clerk shall docket said complaint upon receipt of same. Defendant U.S. Bank, N.A.'s Motion to Dismiss or, Alternatively, Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion to Strike 37 is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 5/14/2012. (LN) |
Filing 36 ORDER: Defendant E.W. Scripps Company's Motion to Dismiss the Third Amended Complaint, Motion to Strike, and Supporting Memorandum of Law 33 is GRANTED as stated herein. Plaintiffs' defamation claim against Scripps is dismissed without prejudice to Plaintiffs to amend this claim within 20 days. Plaintiffs' claims for punitive damages and attorneys' fees are stricken from the Third Amended Complaint with respect to their application to Scripps. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 4/9/2012. (LN) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.