Thompson v. Quigley et al
| Jeffrey K. Thompson |
| Thomas Quigley and Advanced Medical Optics, Inc. |
| 2:2011cv00648 |
| November 9, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Ft. Myers Office |
| Collier |
| Sheri Polster Chappell |
| Charlene E. Honeywell |
| Personal Injury- Medical Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
ORDER adopting 11 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff Jeffery K. Thompson's Amended Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis 8 is DENIED. This action is DISMISSED, without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to terminate all pending motions, enter judgment accordingly, and CLOSE this file. Signed by Judge Charlene E. Honeywell on 1/5/2012. (BGS)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER adopting 4 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. The Report and Recommendation is adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects and is made a part of this order for all purposes, including appellate purposes. Plaintiff Jeff rey K. Thompson's Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis 2 is DENIED, without prejudice. Plaintiff is given leave to file an Amended Complaint within TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS from the date of this Order. Failure to file an Amended Complaint within this time period will result in dismissal of this action without further notice. Signed by Judge Charlene E. Honeywell on 12/1/2011. (BGS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
