Arthrex, Inc. v. Parcus Medical, LLC
Plaintiff: Arthrex, Inc.
Defendant: Parcus Medical, LLC
Case Number: 2:2011cv00694
Filed: December 15, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office: Ft. Myers Office
County: Collier
Presiding Judge: Sheri Polster Chappell
Presiding Judge: John E. Steele
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 145
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 397 ORDER granting 396 Joint Motion for Return of Sealed Documents. The parties are directed to contact the appropriate docket clerk regarding the procedure for the return of the sealed documents. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carol Mirando on 10/15/2014.(ALB)
July 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 390 OPINION AND ORDER granting 195 Parcus' Motion for Claim Construction and 200 Arthrex's Markman Brief in Support of Claim Construction. See Opinion and Order for the Court's construction of the disputed terms. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 7/29/2014. (MAB)
June 19, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 381 ORDER granting 380 Arthrex's Unopposed Motion to Seal Notice of Supplemental Authority. Upon receipt, the Clerk is directed to file the document under seal. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carol Mirando on 6/19/2014. (ALB)
May 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 346 ORDER granting 345 Parcus Medical LLC's Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Under Seal Parcus Medical LLC's Amended Opposition to Arthrex's Motion In Limine to Exclude Evidence Regarding Certain Agreements 343 . Parcus shall mail or hand-deliver the materials to be filed under seal to the Clerk of Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carol Mirando on 5/8/2014. (ALB)
May 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 344 ORDER granting 329 Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Seal Defendant's Opposition to Plaintiff Arthrex's Motion In Limine Regarding Patent Issues Nos. 1 Through 9; granting 331 Parcus Medical LLC's Unopposed Motion for Leave to F ile Under Seal Parcus Medical LLC's Opposition to Arthrex's Motion In Limine to Exclude Evidence Regarding Certain Agreements, Opposition to Arthrex's Motion In Limine to Exclude Evidence Regarding Smith & Nephew Employees' Opinio ns Regarding Arthrex's C3 Agreements, Opposition to Arthrex's Motion In Limine to Exclude Hearsay Statements of Parcus's Customers or Potential Customers, and Opposition to Arthrex's Omnibus Motion In Limine Regarding Parcus' s Counterclaim V; granting 342 Arthrex's Unopposed Motion to Seal Portions of Responses in Opposition to Parcus' Motions In Limine. The parties shall mail or hand-deliver the materials to be filed under seal to the Clerk of Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carol Mirando on 5/7/2014. (ALB)
April 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 303 ORDER granting 297 Motion to Strike Inadvertently Filed Unredacted Draft Motion in Limine. Doc. 286 is stricken, and THE CLERK IS DIRECTED TO REMOVE DOC. 286 FROM THE PUBLIC DOCKET; granting 296 Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Seal Motion in Limine Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7 and 8; granting 279 Parcus Medical, LLC's Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Under Seal Trial Brief Regarding Parcus Counterclaim V and the Arthrex C3 Program, Motion in Limine Regarding Partial Waiver of Attorney -Client Privilege, and Motion in Limine to Exclude Testimony of Kevin McAnaney; granting 285 Arthrex's Unopposed Motion to Seal Portions of Motions in Limine. The parties shall mail or hand-deliver the materials to be filed under seal to the Clerk of Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carol Mirando on 4/17/2014. (ALB)
February 26, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 268 ORDER denying 186 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Supplemental Answers to Arthrex's Interrogatory No. 3 and Production Responsive to Document Request Nos. 1 and 38. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carol Mirando on 2/26/2014. (ALB)
March 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 131 ORDER granting 130 the Non-Party, Orlando Orthopaedic Outpatient Surgery Center, LLC.'s Motion to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum. The subpoena duces tecum served on the Non-Party Orlando Orthopedic Outpatient Surgery Center on March 7, 2013 is hereby QUASHED. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 3/12/2013. (LMF)
November 1, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 120 ORDER granting 53 Defendant, Parcus Medical's Motion to Compel Production of Documents Concerning Arthrex's C3 Contracts and Other Documents Relevant to Commercial Success. Plaintiff, Arthrex shall have up to and including November 6, 2012 to provide documents pursuant to this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 11/1/2012. (LMF)
October 12, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 113 ORDER granting 108 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Seal Portions of Sur-Reply. Plaintiff Arthrex, Inc. is permitted to file under seal an unredacted copy of Arthrex's Response to Parcus Medical, LLCs Supplemental Reply in Support of Parcuss Motion to Compel Production of C3 Documents 107 .Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 10/12/2012. (LMF)
October 5, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 106 ORDER granting 104 the Defendant's Assented-to Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Briefs in Support of Motions for Summary Judgment. Defendant's reply brief must be filed with the Court on or before October 9, 2012. Plaintiff is also granted an extension of time, and must file its sur-reply brief on or before October 19, 2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 10/5/2012. (LMF)
September 21, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 94 ORDER re 84 Response in opposition to motion filed by Arthrex, Inc. The Defendant, Parcus Medicals Reply Brief in Support of Motion to Compel Production of Arthrex C3 Contracts. The Defendant may file its attachments to its Reply Brief 84 under seal with this Court. The Defendant has up to and including Monday September 24, 2012, to file its sealed documents with the Court.Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 9/17/2012. (LMF)
September 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 92 ORDER granting 88 Defendant, Parcus Medicals Renewed Motion to File Under Seal Unredacted Amended Answer and Counterclaims in Response to Arthrexs Amended Complaint, for Limited Purpose of In Camera Inspection and Judicial Determination of Whether Sealing is Appropriate. The Court RESERVES ruling on whether it is appropriate to file the documents under seal with the Court. Defendant is to submit to the Court the unredacted Amended Answer and Counterclaims 87 no later than Tuesday, September 25, 2012, for in camera review. The unredacted Amended Answer and Counterclaims may be submitted via U.S. Mail, FedEx, or UPS to Judge Sheri Polster Chappell, United States Courthouse and Federal Building 2110 First Street, Fort Myers, FL 33901, Attn: Doug Kemp.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 9/17/2012. (LMF)
September 12, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 89 ORDER denying as moot 76 Defendant Parcus Medical's Motion to File Under Seal Unredacted First Amended Answer and Counterclaims for Limited Purpose of In Camera Inspection and Judicial Determination of Whether Sealing is Appropriate. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 9/12/2012. (LMF)
August 31, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 83 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 54 Defendant's Motion to Compel Substantive Answer to Defendant's Interrogatory No. 11. Defendant's Motion to compel subparts (3) and (4) of Interrogatory No. 11 is DENIED. Defendant' s Motion to Compel subparts (1), (2), (5), and (6) of Interrogatory No. 11 is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall provide the requested documents by September 20, 2012. If Plaintiff assets that any documents are privileged, confidential, or work-product, a proper privilege log shall be produced by this date. Defendant's request for an oral argument on this Motion is DENIED.Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 8/31/2012. (LMF)
July 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 52 OPINION AND ORDER granting 18 Motion to dismiss. Count V of the Counterclaim is dismissed without prejudice. Parcus may amend Count V of its Counterclaim within twenty-one days of the entry of this Opinion and Order. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 7/23/2012. (SVC)
July 18, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER granting 50 Plaintiff, Arthrex Inc.s ("Arthrex"), Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Parcus' Motion to Dismiss Arthrex's Claims for Indirect Infringement. Arthrex shall have up to and including August 3, 2012, to respond to Parcus' Motion to Dismiss Arthrex's Claim for Indirect Infringement. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 7/18/2012. (LMF)
March 19, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER granting 28 Joint Motion for Leave to Meet by Telephone to Prepare Case Management Report. (LMH)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Arthrex, Inc. v. Parcus Medical, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Arthrex, Inc.
Represented By: Andrew H. Reiss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Parcus Medical, LLC
Represented By: Simeon D. Brier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?