Peacock v. Tucker et al
James C. Peacock |
Kenneth S. Tucker, J. Tate, Nicolas O. Cabreo-Muniz and D. Strodahl, R.N. |
2:2012cv00063 |
February 6, 2012 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Ft. Myers Office |
De Soto |
John E. Steele |
Douglas N. Frazier |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 129 ORDER denying 128 Motion for Rehearing. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 11/18/2014. (RKR) |
Filing 102 OPINION AND ORDER denying 66 Motion for summary judgment; granting 85 Motion for summary judgment. With no remaining defendants or claims, the Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close the case. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 6/9/2014. (RKR) |
Filing 71 OPINION AND ORDER granting 52 motion to dismiss and all claims against defendant Stordahl are dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk shall enter judgment and terminate this defendant. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 12/20/2013. (RKR) |
Filing 47 OPINION AND ORDER denying in part and granting in part 32 Motion to dismiss case; 41 Motion to dismiss. The motions are denied to the extent they seek dismissal for abuse of judicial process; granted as to Tucker; granted as to Tate; and denied as to Cabreo-Muniz and Strodahl. The Clerk shall enter judgment dismissing the Complaint without prejudice as to Tucker and Tate. See Opinion and Order for details. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 5/22/2013. (RKR) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.