Atkins v. District Board of Trustees of Edison State College et al
| George Stephen Atkins |
| Kenneth P. Walker and District Board of Trustees of Edison State College |
| 2:2012cv00097 |
| February 24, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Ft. Myers Office |
| Charlotte |
| Sheri Polster Chappell |
| John E. Steele |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 27 Plaintiff's Motion for an Order compelling Discovery Claimed to be Privileged. The motion to compel to allow the deposition of Mr. Shearman to continue is GRANTED as set forth in this Order. Mr. Shearman will be required to answer the questions as set forth in paragraph 26 of Plaintiff's Brief. The motion to compel to allow the depositions of Walker, Sproat, and Lupe to continue is DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiff's request for reimbursement of expenses is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 3/8/2013. (LMF)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER re 28 Extension of Discovery Deadline filed by George Stephen Atkins. The Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Discovery Deadline 28 is GRANTED. The discovery deadline in this matter is extended to May 1, 2013. The dispositive and Daubert motions deadline is extended to May 15, 2013. All other deadlines remain unchanged. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 2/21/2013. (LMF)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
