Schwab et al v. The Huntington National Bank
Plaintiff: David A. Schwab and Jerry A. Schwab
Defendant: The Huntington National Bank
Case Number: 2:2012cv00315
Filed: June 7, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office: Ft. Myers Office
County: Collier
Presiding Judge: Sheri Polster Chappell
Presiding Judge: Unassigned Judge
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 154 ORDER dismissing case re 153 Motion to dismiss. The Plaintiff David A. Schwab and the Defendant, Huntington National Bank's Stipulated Dismissal with Prejudice 153 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Stipulation to dismiss the case is GRANTED. The case is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly, terminate all pending motions, and close the case. The Parties request for the Court to retain jurisdiction over the settlement agreement is DENIED. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 7/9/2014. (LMF)
November 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 95 ORDER. The Clerk of Court is Ordered to CANCEL the Final Pretrial Conference set for December 16, 2013. As the Amended Case Management and Scheduling Order 86 is the operative document governing case management deadlines, the Final Pretrial Conference remains set for January 6, 2014 with the trial term beginning February 3, 2014. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 11/25/2013. (LMF)
September 23, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 85 ORDER REFERRING case to the Honorable Magistrate Judge Douglas N. Frazier to conduct a settlement conference and to enter any related Orders as deemed appropriate. The parties shall contact Judge Frazier after the dispositive motions have been filed to obtain a date for a settlement conference convenient with his schedule. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 9/23/2013. (LMF)
February 22, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER: Defendant Huntington National Bank's Amended Motion to Dismiss 18 is granted in part and denied in part. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 2/22/2013. (CH)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Schwab et al v. The Huntington National Bank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David A. Schwab
Represented By: Ellen B. Newberry
Represented By: Jon Douglas Parrish
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jerry A. Schwab
Represented By: Jon Douglas Parrish
Represented By: Ellen B. Newberry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Huntington National Bank
Represented By: Marcel C. Duhamel
Represented By: Joseph G. Foster
Represented By: Liana Hollingsworth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?