Amerisure Mutual Insurance Company et al v. Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company et al
Plaintiff: Amerisure Insurance Company and Amerisure Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant: Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company and Evanston Insurance Company
Case Number: 2:2012cv00443
Filed: August 10, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office: Ft. Myers Office
County: Lee
Presiding Judge: Sheri Polster Chappell
Presiding Judge: John E. Steele
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 19, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 112 OPINION and ORDER granting 61 Defendant Evanston Insurance Company's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. See Opinion and Order for details. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and pursuant to 110 the Court's 8/1/2014 Order, terminate all pending motions and deadlines as moot, and close the file. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 8/19/2014. (MAW)
August 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 110 OPINION AND ORDER granting 57 Defendant Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company's Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint. Counts I and II are dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk shall terminate Defendant Crum & Forster on the docket and withhold judgment pending resolution of Plaintiffs' remaining claims. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 8/1/2014. (MAW)
June 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 109 OPINION AND ORDER overruling Objections; denying 104 Motion to Vacate 98 Order on motion to compel. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 6/16/2014. (RKR)
April 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 98 ORDER granting 90 Plaintiffs Amerisure Insurance Company and Amerisure Mutual Insurance Company's Motion to Compel Discovery. Defendant C&F shall have up to and including May 9, 2014 to produce the documents as set forth in this Order; denying 94 Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File a Reply Brief in Support of Its Motion to Compel Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carol Mirando on 4/29/2014. (BLW)
September 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 53 OPINION AND ORDER denying 20 Amerisure Insurance Company and Amerisure Mutual Insurance Company's Motion for Remand; dismissing 2 Complaint without prejudice; denying as moot 12 Defendant Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company's M otion to Dismiss Complaint; denying as moot 24 Defendant Evanston Insurance Company's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; denying as moot 33 Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings. Plaintiffs may file an amended complaint within twenty one days of this Opinion and Order. See Opinion and Order for details. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 9/12/2013.(AAA)
November 28, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 36 the Defendant Evanston Insurance Company's Motion to Deem Section II.C. of Evanston's Response to Amerisure's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the Pleadings a Reply to Evanston 9;s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings or in the Alternative, Motion for Leave to File a Brief Reply to the Evanston's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. The Defendant Evanston Insurance Company's Motion to Deem Section II.C. of Evanst on's Response to Amerisure's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the Pleadings a Reply to Evanston's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is DENIED. The Defendant Evanston Insurance Company's Alternative Motion to for leave to file a Reply to the Plaintiff Amerisure's Response to Evanston's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is GRANTED. The Reply Brief is limited to five (5) pages in length and limited in scope to the issues regarding the Plaintiff Amerisures position that bidding documents are not incorporated into the construction contracts. The Reply Brief is due on or before December 10, 2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 11/28/2012. (LMF)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Amerisure Mutual Insurance Company et al v. Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amerisure Insurance Company
Represented By: Andrew Frank Russo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amerisure Mutual Insurance Company
Represented By: Andrew Frank Russo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company
Represented By: Holly S. Harvey
Represented By: Jessica S. Forbes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Evanston Insurance Company
Represented By: Rebecca C. Appelbaum
Represented By: Andrea K. Baldwin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?