Branch Banking and Trust Company v. Park Circle, LLC et al
Branch Banking and Trust Company |
Gregory Toth, Stephanie Miller-Toth and Park Circle, LLC |
2:2013cv00025 |
January 15, 2013 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Ft. Myers Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Sheri Polster Chappell |
Unassigned Judge |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 84 ORDER granting 82 Branch Banking and Trust Company's Motion for Entry of Final Judgment. The Plaintiff Branch Banking and Trust Company is awarded damages in the amount of $125,918.75 along with interest of $36,548.20 through Januar y 3, 2013, plus $6,822.82 in late fees for a total deficiency judgment award of $169,289.77 with additional per diem rate of interest of $62.10 accruing thereafter. The Plaintiff Branch Banking and Trust Company is awarded $36,956 .50 in attorney and paralegal fees and $465.00 in costs accruing interest pursuant to the interest rate allowed in 28 U.S.C. § 1961. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter final judgment including attorney's fees and costs, terminate any pending motions and close the file. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 8/26/2014. (LMF) |
Filing 83 ORDER denying 79 Defendant Gregory Toth's Claim of Exemption and Request for Hearing. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carol Mirando on 8/15/2014. (BLW) |
Filing 81 ORDER adopting 78 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 57 MOTION for Attorney Fees and Taxation of Costs filed by Branch Banking and Trust Company. The Report and Recommendation of the Honorable United States Magistrate Judge Carol Mira ndo recommending that the Plaintiff Branch Banking and Trust Company's (BB&T) Motion for Attorney's Fees and Taxation of Costs be Granted 78 is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED and the findings incorporated herein.The Plaintiff Branch Banking and Tr ust Company's (BB&T) Motion for Attorney's Fees and Taxation of Costs 57 filed on May 30, 2014, is GRANTED.The Plaintiff is hereby AWARDED $36,956.50 in attorney and paralegal fees; and $465.00 in costs. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 8/7/2014. (LMF) |
Filing 54 ORDER granting 39 The Plaintiff, Branch Banking and Trust Company's (BB&T) Motion for Final Summary Judgment. The Clerk of the Court is directed to: DISMISS the case and terminate any pending motions, and enter judgment accordingly. The Plai ntiff Branch Banking and Trust Company is awarded damages in the amount of $125,918.75 along with interest of $36,548.20 through January 3, 2013, plus $6,822.82 in late fees for a total deficiency judgment award of $169,289.77 wit h additional per diem rate of interest of $62.10 accruing thereafter. The Court will RESERVE on the entry of attorney's fees and cost and directs the Plaintiff to submit a proper motion for fees and costs providing documentation (with hou rs worked and a description of the work performed for each hour entry) for any attorney's fees and costs within twenty-one (21) days of the entry of judgment. The final pretrial conference and trial are hereby cancelled.. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 5/8/2014. (LMF) |
Filing 42 ORDER granting 40 the Defendant Gregory Toth's Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Cross-Claim without Prejudice 40 is GRANTED. The Cross-Claim filed against Stephanie Miller-Toth is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 3/10/2014. (LMF) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.