Egbanor v. Otaal 3, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Marlene Egbanor
Defendant: Otaal 3, Inc. and Ravneet Singh
Case Number: 2:2013cv00329
Filed: April 29, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office: Ft. Myers Office
County: Brevard
Presiding Judge: Sheri Polster Chappell
Presiding Judge: Unassigned Magistrate
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 26, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER dismissing case re 26 Motion for Settlement. Plaintiff's Complaint 1 hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly, terminate all previously scheduled deadlines and pending motions, and close the file. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 3/26/2014. (LMF)
March 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER re 20 Response to order to show cause filed by Otaal 3, Inc., Ravneet Singh. Plaintiff shall have up to and including March 7, 2014, to submit the settlement documents for review attached to a joint motion for approval of an FLSA settlement agreement in compliance with the above. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 3/2/2014. (LMF)
January 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER. This Court's January 16, 2014 Order 21 is vacated. The Clerk of Court is directed to make a notation on the docket sheet that this Order is vacated. The Clerk is further directed to remove the administrative closure of this case in C M/ECF. The Plaintiffs are hereby directed to file a joint motion with the Court requesting the Court's approval of the FLSA settlement agreement in compliance with Lynn's Food Stores, Inc. v. United States, 679 F.2d 1350, 1354-55 (11th Cir . 1982). The joint motion shall include a copy of the settlement agreement signed by all parties, a brief description of the terms of the settlement, the number of hours and lost wages originally claimed by the Plaintiff and whether or not the Plaint iff's claims were settled by compromise, as well as the Plaintiff's Counsel's attorney's fees and costs and whether or not said fees and costs were negotiated separately from the FLSA claim. The Plaintiff shall provide the Court with said information in a motion on or before February 7, 2014. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 1/17/2014. (LMF)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Egbanor v. Otaal 3, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Otaal 3, Inc.
Represented By: Christina Marie Sanchez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ravneet Singh
Represented By: Christina Marie Sanchez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marlene Egbanor
Represented By: Christina Jean Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?