Serefex Corporation v. Jonas et al
Serefex Corporation |
John Piini, J.J. Piini, Kenneth Snyder, Sr., Robert Jonas and David D'Anza |
2:2013cv00356 |
May 9, 2013 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Ft. Myers Office |
Collier |
John E. Steele |
Unassigned Magistrate |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 88 OPINION AND ORDER dismissing plaintiff's First Amended Complaint without prejudice to filing a Second Amended Complaint within fourteen (14) days of this Opinion and Order; denying as moot 40 defendants James Piini and John Piini's Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint with Prejudice; denying as moot 42 defendants Robert Jonas and Kenneth Snyder, Sr.'s Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint with Prejudice or for More Definite Statement; denying as moot 52 defendant Robert J onas' Motion to Supplement and Amend Motion to Dismiss; denying without prejudice 58 defendants Robert Jonas and Kenneth Snyder, Sr.'s Motion for Rule 11 Sanction. See Opinion and Order for details. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 5/5/2014. (MAB) |
Filing 87 ORDER granting 82 Plaintiff's Renewed Motion for Extension of Time to Secure Local Counsel. Plaintiff shall have up to and including 5/10/14 in which to obtain local counsel, who should file a Notice of appearance by that date. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carol Mirando on 3/31/2014. (ALB) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.