Johnson v. Scott et al
| Adam J. Johnson |
| Thomas W. Cole, Mike Scott and Unknown Sheriff's Deputy(s) |
| 2:2013cv00500 |
| July 9, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Ft. Myers Office |
| Lee |
| Sheri Polster Chappell |
| Unassigned Magistrate |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
ORDER granting 35 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment as to Counts 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. Moreover, Counts 7, 8, and 9 are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this action and enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 10/27/2014. (LMF)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER granting 27 Defendants' Motion to Compel; denying 32 Defendants' Motion for Leave to File Response. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carol Mirando on 9/2/2014.(ALB)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 10 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Count I is dismissed against Defendant Scott only. Count II is dismissed. Count III is dismissed. Count IV is dismissed with regard to the negligent hiring claim and the discretionary aspects of the negligent training claim. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint on or before November 15, 2013. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 11/1/2013. (LMF)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
