Arrow Electronics, Inc. v. AFC Green Electric, Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Eleventh Circuit Florida Middle District Arrow Electronics, Inc. v. AFC Green Electric, Inc.

Arrow Electronics, Inc. v. AFC Green Electric, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Arrow Electronics, Inc.
Defendant:	AFC Green Electric, Inc.
Case Number:	2:2013cv00584
Filed:	August 12, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office:	Ft. Myers Office
County:	XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:	John E. Steele
Presiding Judge:	Unassigned Magistrate
Nature of Suit:	Contract: Other
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 17, 2015	Filing 19 ORDER granting in part and denying without prejudice in part 16 Plaintiff, Arrow Electronics, Inc.'s, Motion to Compel and for Sanctions. The motion is granted to the extent that Benjamin Mading must appear for a properly noticed deposition on or before April 10, 2015 and provide to Plaintiff all documents responsive to Plaintiff's Subpoena Duces Tecum. To the extent that the motion seeks sanctions for Mr. Mading's noncompliance and repeated failure to appear, the motion is denied without prejudice. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carol Mirando on 3/17/2015.(ALB)
January 8, 2014	Filing 13 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 12 Motion for Default Judgment. The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of plaintiff and against defendant as to Count I as stated in the Order and dismissing remaining counts without prejudice, terminate all deadlines, and close the file. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 1/8/2014. (RKR)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 17, 2015

Filing 19 ORDER granting in part and denying without prejudice in part 16 Plaintiff, Arrow Electronics, Inc.'s, Motion to Compel and for Sanctions. The motion is granted to the extent that Benjamin Mading must appear for a properly noticed deposition on or before April 10, 2015 and provide to Plaintiff all documents responsive to Plaintiff's Subpoena Duces Tecum. To the extent that the motion seeks sanctions for Mr. Mading's noncompliance and repeated failure to appear, the motion is denied without prejudice. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carol Mirando on 3/17/2015.(ALB)

January 8, 2014

Filing 13 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 12 Motion for Default Judgment. The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of plaintiff and against defendant as to Count I as stated in the Order and dismissing remaining counts without prejudice, terminate all deadlines, and close the file. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 1/8/2014. (RKR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Arrow Electronics, Inc. v. AFC Green Electric, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Arrow Electronics, Inc.
Represented By:	Jennifer Hayes Pinder
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: AFC Green Electric, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?