Ave Maria School of Law v. Sebelius et al
Plaintiff: Ave Maria School of Law
Defendant: Kathleen Sebelius, Thomas Perez, United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Labor, United States Department of Treasury and Jacob Lew
Case Number: 2:2013cv00795
Filed: November 12, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office: Ft. Myers Office
County: Collier
Presiding Judge: Sheri Polster Chappell
Presiding Judge: Douglas N. Frazier
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Injunction
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDER: Plaintiff Ave Maria School of Law's Motion for Preliminary Injunction 57 is GRANTED. Defendants are enjoined from enforcing against Ave Maria School of Law the substantive requirements set forth in 42 U.S.C. § 300gg-13(a)(4) and its implementing guidance and regulations, and from assessing fines or taking other enforcement action against Ave Maria School of Law for noncompliance. This preliminary injunction takes effect immediately, and shall remain in effect pending entr y of final judgment in this matter or further order of this Court. This case is stayed pending resolution of the appeal in Eternal Word Television Network, Inc. v. Sec'y, U.S. Dep't of Health & Human Servs., et al., No. 14-12696-CC (11th C ir. filed July 28, 2014). The Clerk is directed to administratively CLOSE this case. The parties are directed to notify the Court of the final disposition of Eternal Word Television Network, Inc. v. Sec'y, U.S. Dep't of Health & Human Servs., et al., No. 14-12696-CC (11th Cir. filed July 28, 2014) within 30 days thereof. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 10/28/2014. (LN)
July 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ORDER: Plaintiff's Partially Unopposed Scheduling Motion (Dkt. 54) is granted in part. The Court's prior scheduling Order set forth at Dkt. 52 is hereby VACATED. The parties may brief a preliminary injunction motion. The School's motion for preliminary injunction shall be filed on or before September 12, 2014. The Government's response to the motion for preliminary injunction shall be filed on or before September 22, 2014. The parties are allotted 35 pages for argument. The Court will issue a ruling on the motion for preliminary injunction prior to the November 1, 2014 deadline. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 7/30/2014. (LN)
July 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER: The parties have thirty (30) days to file a motion for summary judgment on any remaining issues in this case in light of Hobby Lobby. Responses to any motion for summary judgment are due within fourteen (14) days from the filing of the motion. Any pending motions are denied as moot. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 7/25/2014. (LN)
February 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER of recusal. Judge Sheri Polster Chappell recused. The Clerk of the Court is directed to reassign the case to another District Judge. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 2/3/2014. (LMF)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ave Maria School of Law v. Sebelius et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ave Maria School of Law
Represented By: Gregory S. Baylor
Represented By: Matthew S. Bowman
Represented By: David A. Cortman
Represented By: Roger K. Gannam
Represented By: Jeremy D. Tedesco
Represented By: Kevin Hayden Theriot
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kathleen Sebelius
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas Perez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Department of Health and Human Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Department of Labor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Department of Treasury
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jacob Lew
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?