Brent v. Source Interlink Distribution, LLC et al
| Debbie Brent |
| Source Interlink Companies, Inc. and Source Interlink Distribution, LLC |
| 2:2014cv00052 |
| January 29, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Ft. Myers Office |
| Lee |
| Sheri Polster Chappell |
| Douglas N. Frazier |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
ORDER denying 25 Defendant Source Interlink Companies, Inc.'s Motion to Stay Proceedings; denying 34 Defendant Source Interlink Companies, Inc.'s Motion for Leave to File Reply to Plaintiff's Response to Defendant Source Interlink Companies' Motion to Stay Proceedings. Plaintiff Brent is directed to comply with the CM/ECF Administrative procedures going forward in this case. See M.D. Fla. Admin. Proc. for Elec. Filing in Civil and Criminal Cases ("Separate Attachment: Each separate exhibit must be filed as a separate attachment to the main document."). Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 8/21/2014. (LMF)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER re 18 Notice (Other) filed by Source Interlink Distribution, LLC. This matter is stayed as it relates to Defendant Source Interlink Distribution, LLC only. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 7/11/2014. (LMF)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER denying 6 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint and Incorporated Memorandum of Law. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 3/28/2014. (LMF)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
