Southwest Florida Area Local, American Postal Workers Union v. United States Postal Service

Justia Dockets & Filings Eleventh Circuit Florida Middle District Southwest Florida Area Local, American Postal Workers Union v. United States Postal Service

Southwest Florida Area Local, American Postal Workers Union v. United States Postal Service

Petitioner:	Southwest Florida Area Local, American Postal Workers Union
Respondent:	United States Postal Service
Case Number:	2:2014cv00075
Filed:	February 11, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office:	Ft. Myers Office
County:	Lee
Presiding Judge:	John E. Steele
Presiding Judge:	Douglas N. Frazier
Nature of Suit:	Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action:	29 U.S.C. § 1401
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 2, 2015	Filing 46 OPINION AND ORDER adopting 41 Report and Recommendation; granting 29 Respondent's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; denying 32 Petitioner's Cross Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; and denying 1 Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award. See Opinion and Order for details. The Clerk shall terminate all pending motions and deadlines as moot and close the file. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 3/2/2015. (MAW)
September 19, 2014	Filing 27 OPINION and ORDER sustaining in part and overruling in part 23 Petitioner's Objections to the Report and Recommendation and 24 Respondent's Objections to the Report and Recommendation; rejecting 22 Report and Recommendation; and denying 8 Respondent's Motion to Dismiss. See Opinion and Order for details. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 9/19/2014. (MAW)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 2, 2015

Filing 46 OPINION AND ORDER adopting 41 Report and Recommendation; granting 29 Respondent's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; denying 32 Petitioner's Cross Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; and denying 1 Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award. See Opinion and Order for details. The Clerk shall terminate all pending motions and deadlines as moot and close the file. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 3/2/2015. (MAW)

September 19, 2014

Filing 27 OPINION and ORDER sustaining in part and overruling in part 23 Petitioner's Objections to the Report and Recommendation and 24 Respondent's Objections to the Report and Recommendation; rejecting 22 Report and Recommendation; and denying 8 Respondent's Motion to Dismiss. See Opinion and Order for details. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 9/19/2014. (MAW)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Southwest Florida Area Local, American Postal Workers Union v. United States Postal Service
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Southwest Florida Area Local, American Postal Workers Union
Represented By:	Richard D. Lara
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: United States Postal Service
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?