Roth v. ABCW, LLC et al
| James Roth |
| ABCW, LLC and Catarino A. Borrego |
| 2:2014cv00227 |
| April 21, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Ft. Myers Office |
| Collier |
| John E. Steele |
| Carol Mirando |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 33 Motion for Default Judgment. The Clerk shall enter default judgment in favor of plaintiff and against defendants on all counts as set forth in the Opinion and Order, terminate all pending matters, and close the file. See Opinion and Order for details. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 11/30/2016. (RKR)
|
|
Filing
30
OPINION AND ORDER adopting and incorporating 29 Report and Recommendations; striking 12 Answer and Affirmative Defenses. The Clerk shall enter a default against defendants. Plaintiff shall file a motion for default judgment within 60 days of this Order. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 2/1/2016. (RKR)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER granting 23 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Production of Documents. Defendant ABCW shall have up to and including September 14, 2015 to retain counsel and have counsel file a notice of appearance in this action. Defendants shall have up to and including September 30, 2015 to respond to Plaintiff's interrogatories and request for production. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carol Mirando on 8/31/2015. (ANW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
