Jackson v. St. Jude Medical Neuromodulation Division et al
Daniel Jackson |
Medtronic, Inc., St. Jude Medical Neuromodulation Division and Allstate Property & Casualty Insurance Company |
2:2014cv00318 |
June 9, 2014 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Ft. Myers Office |
Lee |
Sheri Polster Chappell |
Carol Mirando |
Property Damage Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 59 ORDER. This case is REMANDED to the Circuit Court of the Twentieth Judicial Circuit in and for Lee County, Florida.The Clerk is DIRECTED to transmit a certified copy of this Order to the Clerk of the Court of the Twentieth Judicial Circuit in and for Lee County, Florida. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close this case, terminate any scheduled hearings and deadlines, and deny any pending motions as moot. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 10/20/2014. (LMF) |
Filing 50 ORDER denying 15 Plaintiff Daniel Jackson's Motion to Remand; denying as moot 23 Defendant Medtronic, Inc.'s Notice of Joinder in Defendant St. Jude Medical Neuromodulation Division's Response In Opposition to Plaintiff's Mot ion to Remand and Further Memorandum In Opposition and Request For Severance. Defendants St. Jude and Medtronic are ORDERED to show cause as to why the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000 as to Defendant Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company on or before October 3, 2014. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 9/22/2014. (LMF) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.