Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe
| Malibu Media, LLC |
| John Doe |
| 2:2014cv00511 |
| August 29, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Ft. Myers Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Sheri Polster Chappell |
| Carol Mirando |
| Copyrights |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
ORDER granting 26 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration of Order. The Court awards Plaintiff Malibu Media, LLC $35,250.00 in statutory damages pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 504 rather than $6,000. All other portions of the default judgment shall remain the same. 25 . The Clerk is directed to amend the judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 6/2/2015. (LMF)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER granting 20 Motion for Entry of Default Judgment against Defendant Mark Danford. A permanent injunction is ENTERED against Defendant Mark Danford:a. Defendant Mark Danford is permanently enjoined from directly or indirectly infringing Pl aintiff Malibu Media, LLC's rights in the Works. b. Defendant Mark Danford is permanently enjoined from using the Internet to reproduce, copy, distribute, or make the Works available for distribution to the public, unless Mark Danford receives a license or express authority from Plaintiff Malibu Media, LLC. c. Defendant Mark Danford is required to destroy all illegal downloaded or reproduced copies of the Works in his possession, custody, or control. 3. The Court awards Plaintiff Malibu Me dia, LLC $6,000.00 in statutory damages pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 504. In addition, the Court awards Plaintiff Malibu Media, LLC $1,182.00 in attorneys' fees and $475.00 in costs pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 505. 4. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice. 5. The Clerk is directed to close the case and enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 5/12/2015. (LMF)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER re 22 Response to order to show cause filed by Malibu Media, LLC. The Court finds no further action is needed in relation to the Court's April 16, 2015, Order to Show Cause. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 4/24/2015. (LMF)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER granting 15 Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Clerk's Default Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a) Against Defendant Mark Danford. The Clerk is directed to enter Clerk's Default against Defendant Mark Danford. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carol Mirando on 2/4/2015. (BLW)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER granting 3 Motion for Leave to Serve a Third Party Subpoena Prior to a Rule 26(f) Conference. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 9/27/2014. (LMF)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Malibu Media, LLC | |
| Represented By: | M. Keith Lipscomb |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: John Doe | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
