Valle v. Lee County Sheriff's Office et al
David Jairo Valle |
Garylee McDermed, Doe 1 and Mike Scott |
2:2014cv00626 |
October 27, 2014 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Ft. Myers Office |
Lee |
John E. Steele |
Carol Mirando |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 45 OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 37 Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint; adopting and incorporating 44 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiff may file a Second Amended Complaint within 14 days of this Opinion and Order as set forth in the Opinion and Order. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 9/22/2015. (RKR) |
Filing 41 ORDER granting nunc pro tunc 36 Plaintiff's Third Motion for Extension of Deadline for Motions to Add Parties or Amend Pleadings, accepting as timely filed 37 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint; denying as moot 39 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Reply to Defendants' Response to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Extension of Deadline to Add Parties/Amend Pleadings; denying as moot 40 Plaintiff's Updated Motion for Leave to File Reply to Defendants' Response to Plaintiff's Third Motion for Extension of Deadline to Add Parties/Amend Pleadings. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carol Mirando on 7/21/2015. (ALB) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.