Wright et al v. Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. et al
Molly Wright, Trisha Bremer, Shawn Fisher, Kimberly Fisher, James R. Marshall, Angela McDougall, Thomas Patterson, Michael Piasecki, Chris A. Wiglesworth and Dorothy Willis |
Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. and Law Offices of Daniel C. Consuegra, P.L. |
2:2015cv00249 |
April 17, 2015 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Ft. Myers Office |
Lee |
Sheri Polster Chappell |
Douglas N. Frazier |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 99 ORDER granting 87 Defendant Dyck-O'Neal, Inc.'s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly, terminate any pending motions and deadlines, and close the file. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 2/15/2017. (LMF) |
Filing 94 ORDER. Plaintiffs and Defendant Dyck O'Neal shall each file a brief, not to exceed five (5) pages in length, on or before January 4, 2017, addressing why this Court should or should not dismiss Count II of the Complaint on the ground that th ere is no private cause of action under the Florida Consumer Collection Protections Act for not serving a notice of assignment in accordance with Florida Statute § 559.715. Until the parties brief this issue, the Court reserves ruling on DONI's motion for judgment on the pleadings. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 12/22/2016. (LMF) |
Filing 81 ORDER re 79 OBJECTION re 77 Order. Defendant Dyck-O'Neal, Inc.'s Objection to Magistrate's Order 79 is OVERRULED. The Court affirms the Honorable Mac R. McCoy's Order denying Defendants' motions to stay 77 . Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 9/15/2016. (LMF) |
Filing 70 ORDER adopting 68 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 58 MOTION for miscellaneous relief, specifically to Deny Class Certification filed by Law Offices of Daniel C. Consuegra, P.L., 56 MOTION for miscellaneous relief, specifi cally to Deny Class Certification. The Report and Recommendation 68 is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED and the findings incorporated herein. Defendant Dyck O'Neal, Inc.'s Motion to Deny Class Certification 56 , construed as a motion to strike the c lass allegations in the Complaint, is GRANTED. Defendant Law Offices of Daniel C. Consuegra's Motion to Deny Class Certification 58 , construed as a motion to strike the class allegations in the Complaint, is GRANTED. The class allegations in the Complaint 1 are STRICKEN. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 7/18/2016. (LMF) |
Filing 69 ORDER adopting 67 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Complaint filed by Thomas Patterson, Dorothy Willis, Shawn Fisher, Chris A. Wiglesworth, James R. Marshall, Angela McDougall, Molly Wright, Trisha Bremer, Michael Piasecki, Kimberly Fisher. The Report and Recommendation 67 is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED and the findings incorporated herein. Plaintiff James Marshall is dismissed from this action. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 7/1/2016. (LMF) |
Filing 36 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 16 Defendant Law Offices of Daniel C. Consuegra, P.L.'s Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment to Plaintiff's Class Action Complaint. Count II of the Class Act ion Complaint 1 is dismissed as against Defendant Law Offices of Daniel C. Consuegra, P.L., and Count I survives against both Defendant Consuegra and Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. Defendant Law Offices of Daniel C. Consuegra, P.L. has until November 10, 2015, to file an answer to Count I of the Class Action Complaint. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 10/27/2015. (LMF) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.