McClain v. Secretary, DOC et al
Plaintiff: Cody McClain
Defendant: Secretary, DOC, D.G. Lawrence, Wexford Health Services, Inc. and Robert Michael Danzig
Case Number: 2:2015cv00594
Filed: September 30, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office: Ft. Myers Office
County: De Soto
Presiding Judge: Sheri Polster Chappell
Presiding Judge: Carol Mirando
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 74 OPINION AND ORDER re: 71 Notice of voluntary dismissal construed as a motion pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2) is granted and the Clerk shall enter judgment dismissing this case without prejudice, terminate any pending motions and deadlines, and close this file. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 8/26/2019. (SLU)
March 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 66 OPINION AND ORDER denying as moot re: 65 MOTION to Compel Plantiff to Respond to Discovery. The Court by separate order will enter a discovery schedule. Granting 59 MOTION to dismiss for failure to state a claim terminating MOTION to Strike, denying in its entirety 60 MOTION to dismiss for failure to state a claim MOTION to Strike and Defendant Kubik shall fine an Answer to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint within twenty (20) days of the date of this Order. Plaint iff's Amended Complaint is DISMISSED against Defendant Robert Michael Danzig D.D.S. pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), or in the alternative pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a)(1). Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 3/8/2019. (SLU)
June 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 57 OPINION AND ORDER granting re: 43 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint and dismissing with prejudice 41 Amended Complaint as against Defendants Jones and Lawrence. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 6/28/2018. (SLU)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McClain v. Secretary, DOC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cody McClain
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Secretary, DOC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: D.G. Lawrence
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wexford Health Services, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert Michael Danzig
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?