Loveland v. Scott et al
| Robert E. Loveland |
| Mike Scott, Andrew Small, Lourdes Carrero, Rhonda Mason and Shirlette Thomas |
| 2:2015cv00621 |
| October 7, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Ft. Myers Office |
| Lee |
| Unassigned Judge |
| Carol Mirando |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
63
ORDER OF DISMISSAL granting 53 Motion to dismiss. Plaintiff's deliberate indifference claim against Defendant Thomas is dismissed as unexhausted. Alternatively, the claim is dismissed for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of defendant and close the file. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 7/27/2017. (RKR)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER denying 46 motion to dismiss and defendant Thomas shall file an answer on or before August 12, 2016. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 7/21/2016. (RKR)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER granting 22 motion to dismiss and all claims against Mike Scott are dismissed; granting 29 motion to dismiss; granting 37 motion to dismiss and all claims against Small, Lourdes, Carrerro, Mason, and Thomas are dismissed. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint against Thomas within 14 days. See Order for details. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 5/20/2016. (RKR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
